Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Wednesday Nov 11, 2009

State wants to ditch willing seller concept for land redistribution

The government gave notice yesterday that the willing-buyer, willing-seller concept for land redistribution would be ditched in favour of a system of average hectare price offers and expropriation because the process was lagging far behind.

Rural Development and Land Reform Minister Gugile Nkwinti told an economics cluster briefing of ministers yesterday that the government was "obsessed" with achieving the transfer to 30 percent of agricultural land to the previously disadvantaged. But he acknowledged that the deadline for doing so - set for 2014 - was under review because the process was lagging far behind.

So far only about 5 percent of land had been transferred, he noted, emphasising that 87 percent of land was still in the hands of the minority - a reference to white farmers - and the rest was held by the majority.

"The government must deal with the 87 percent and 13 percent split," said Nkwinti. He rejected concern that extending the date for achieving the aim would destabilise commercial farming as farmers would not be certain whether they would be able to retain their farms.

Nkwinti said he was keen to avoid a repeat of the experience of a neighbouring state - a clear reference to Zimbabwe - where the land issue had led to significant "polarisation".

He said that the full budget for land restitution - returning land to the dispossessed - had been spent in the first quarter of this financial year as prices demanded by farmers mounted. Discussions with certain farmers' unions were fruitful in that average prices of farmland per hectare were established. This was substantially lower than what he called the extortionate amounts demanded by some farmers.

Hinting that this would be the route followed in future, he said the willing-seller and willing-buyer concept had been reviewed at an alliance summit before the Polokwane national conference of the ANC, where it was decided it "doesn't work".

Department director-general Thozi Gwanya first hinted last week that the government would not be able to achieve the 30 percent target and was pondering extending the deadline to 2025. He cited lack of funds and the recession for the rethink by the government.

Like his predecessor, ex-land affairs minister Lulu Xingwana, Nkwinti took a stab at game farmers gobbling up arable farm land that could be used for maize and potatoes.

He said if you drove from Grahamstown to Port Elizabeth in the Eastern Cape, all along the way there were signs for game farms.

Business Report

Comments:

I think the Minister is correct, for peace to prevail in this land, black people must be empowered including getting their land back and redistribution working. Whites are still lucky, because by now they would have packed thier bags and go to Europe and Americas. I applauad the ANC government so far, they did a difficult job so far of balancing interests against vicious attacks from some detractors. Minister you have our support, we are expecting a lot from you, we know its a tough job but proceed.

Posted by Lesiba on November 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM SAST Report this Comment

Well isn't that just peachy. Did we take into account all the land the government owns? I think not! They own far more land than anyone else, but I don't see that being re-distributed? Or is it only to those same white developers that can afford the kick-backs to buy from you?

Posted by JC on November 11, 2009 at 12:08 PM SAST Report this Comment

Lesiba, while I agree on some land being given back to blacks, do you want this done at the expense of food production? Your comment that whites are lucky is ridiculous, some whites are more South African than you so think before making stupid comments as a result of a huge chip on your shoulder.

Posted by Nick on November 11, 2009 at 12:50 PM SAST Report this Comment

this attitude by the government that is "obsessed" is of extreme concern. Agriculture in this country is very precariously balanced due to very scarce resources especially arable land. So far this land distribution policy has not proven to be a raging success. Many of the so called previously disadvantaged "farmers" that have taken over the once fertile and very productive lands have shown beyond doubt that they are not up to the task of managing these extrmely fragile resources carefully. This sort of expertise takes generations of adaptive learning to maintain and improve productivity. You cant just hand a farm over and expect success. If this government maintains its "obsessive" stance, all it will succeed in doing is creating and hastening a situation of decreasing outputs from the agricultural sector, increasing reliance on imports .. all to the detriment of our economy.

Posted by mark on November 11, 2009 at 03:45 PM SAST Report this Comment

Lesiba, please stop playing the race card .. it is NOT going to help "peace prevail in our land" as you so fondly wish for. Distributing land to fill a arbitrarily determined ratio is NOT the key to peace .. Feeding the people of our country, providing them with basic utilities, education and medical care is what is required. Allow those who are experts in their fields to to what they do best. Right now is just so happens that after 300 years of hard learned practical experience that white farmers are the experts in agriculture .. in many years time as natural change takes place, the ratios WILL change, and the people of our country will still be fed .. Dont hasten unrest by politically motivated shortsighted policies .

Posted by mark on November 11, 2009 at 03:52 PM SAST Report this Comment

Not one of the farms redistributed to date has been farmed. Hundreds of farms lie dormant after being plundered and thousands of jobs have been lost already... and now you want to accelerate the process. Wow you lot are smart! The government is hurting the people they are supposed to be supporting. What part of "This doesn't work" dont you understand? But then again the government don't care about the people, only their 750IL and lining their pockets as they have so very well demonstrated. Show me one ANC official that is actually interested in helping the people and doesnt own a R1 million+ car. Heck lets all go back to subsistance farming and living in mud huts because that where the government is heading at breakneck pace. Well Done African National Corruption!!!

Posted by Shaun on November 11, 2009 at 09:25 PM SAST Report this Comment

.I completely agree that there has to be land redistribution. The land issue comes back to haunt everyone in many countries over and over again throughout history. SA cannot afford to ignore this issue and white south africans need to understand this- look at your neighbour. HOWEVER, I have learnt that farming is very risky, takes a lot of organisation and planning and a great deal of skill and money. There needs to be serious mutually beneficial partnerships between farmers and workers. Farming is in their blood and this is one skill that South Africa CANNOT afford to lose. If south africa cannot feed itself and remain independant of other countries for its food supply there will be civil war. Land distribution must only occur if the food supply chain is not disrupted in SA. My black brothers do not let pride and hurts from the past shipwreck your future. Things are rocky enough in South Africa to not have a food shortage issue occur.

Posted by clint mcdonald on November 12, 2009 at 07:22 AM SAST Report this Comment

As a person who know land values etc, i can agree with the Minister that some farmers want exhorbirant prices for their farms, however if the government used knowledgeable valuers in this process this would never have happpened. Dont blame the willing seller willing buyer concept, rather blame incompetence. Just wish the current goverment can one day move on and get rid of their obsession with race!!! It will eventually kill this country! Will we hate each other forever?

Posted by Property Valuer on November 12, 2009 at 07:48 AM SAST Report this Comment

As much as people want to reduce this to just a race issue, I beg to differ. The current situation at the moment is not feasible and will lead to further polarisation of our people. If the 'expert' white farmers were willing to equip with skills black farmworkers instead of abusing them, we would'nt need to go this route. The land belongs to people of this country and must be shared equitably.

Posted by Mnothi on November 12, 2009 at 08:27 AM SAST Report this Comment

The 87%/13% split is a fallacy. Taking into account that the Government is now "black" the split is more like 60% of land in black hands. This takes into account Kwa Zulu Natal and Transkei. It is dangerous for the future of democracy for people of SA to give the politicians the right to decide who may own land or not. Zimbabwe is a case in point - the black majority started off thinking they would benefit but at the end of the day it was only the politicians and their friends.

Posted by dave on November 12, 2009 at 09:11 AM SAST Report this Comment

Mnothi it is no secret that there are white farmers that abuse their black staff, i certainly wont deny that. But do not imply by your statement that ALL white farmers abuse their staff and dont share their knowledge. THAT is a false implication. The current situation (of the govt hell bent on distributing land at all costs)is indeed not feasable and WILL lead to further polarisation and major damage to our agriculture, economy and cause further suffering to the poor. The hand over of generations of knowledge of modern day farming skills takes YEARS to implement. We are talking about transfering the abilities to manage and farm high tech enterprises, not cultivating a few mielies with a skoffel and keeping a few goats on a patch of land. There is a HUGE diference in the abilities and knowledge required between the two. This will be a long but succesfull process if managed carefully, but a total disaster(Zimbabwe) if rushed willy nilly simply for political agenda's

Posted by mark on November 12, 2009 at 10:04 AM SAST Report this Comment

Shaun, you are not entirely correct, some of the farms handed over to new black farmers are actually doing ok, so the potential for success is there. I do agree that unfortunately it seems that the majority of the hand overs to date have been dismal failures. But is that from lack of ability or poor managemnt and training OR politically motivated decisions that fly in the face of commons sense and scientific fact.? I believe Propery Valuer is right in saying that a lot of the delays have been due to administrative incompetence And i totally agree, the sooner we burn the race card, dispose of the raft of corrupt and self seeking politicians (mainly ANC) and focus on developing PEOPLE, the sooner this country will realise its incredible economic potential.

Posted by mark on November 12, 2009 at 10:14 AM SAST Report this Comment

Personally, I am encouraged by the robust and (mostly) intelligent debate in the comments on this article. Let's keep talking to each other. No single view is entirely correct. We must learn to hear each other and reach consensus or compromise. Remember, we don't know or understand what is in somebody else's bowl of tears.

Posted by Hopeful on November 12, 2009 at 12:19 PM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds