Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Wednesday Jun 30, 2010

Shackdwellers shun free homes as their pets are banned

On Thursday residents of Rietvlei Bos, a makeshift community just outside Melkbosstrand, are to get new homes for free. There's just one catch: they won't be allowed to keep their pets.

Rietvlei Bos is small, consisting of only about 35 shacks.

Most are family households, and many have dogs or cats.

"This is our protection while we're in the bush," said Marlene Gillings, 54.

Four years ago Gillings adopted her dog, the Duke of Dogmoore, or just Duke for short. Duke was just over three weeks old, the runt of the litter. Gillings says she used to carry him around in her baseball cap.

Although her home is falling apart, thanks to strong winds, she won't be moving into the house offered to her in Melkbosch Village because she's been told that Duke won't be allowed to move in with her.

Melkbosch Village is an 18-hectare, R400-million housing development by Asrin Property Developers.

Under an agreement with the City of Cape Town, 100 of the 450 units are to be subsidised homes, to be providedfree to disadvantaged people.

The plan is the first of its kind in the Western Cape, and calls for Asrin to pay two thirds of the cost of building the subsidised homes.

Project attorney Christo Marais said the homeowners association and the developers had decided early on that the 50 duplexes that were to make up the 100 subsidised units, as well as the 222 flats, would be pet-free.

The duplexes are in a self-contained section, divided from the rest of the development. Each of the one- and two-bedroomed units, available for families only, comes with a small backyard.

"There's just enough space back here. One could even build a kennel for their pet," said Hendricks Sackson, a subcontractor for the project.

Many residents of Rietvlei see Melkbosch Village as a godsend.

Some are to give their pets away, to a relative or to a kennel.

But resident Chris Lielde said he was determined to keep at least one of his four cats - by going to court, if necessary.

"There are a lot of dogs and cats here and they are family to us," said Emily Smit, a community leader who runs a primary school.

"They are our children."

And Gillings has a petition going, with more than 50 signatures, attesting that Duke is "a good dog".

Duke, like all the dogs and cats in Rietvlei, have been sterilised, according to Patty Diedrichs, a Melkbosstrand woman who helps make sure the pets stay healthy.

Marais, however, said the health of the animals wasn't the issue.

"The rule are the rules," he said. "If they want to keep four or five pets and stay in the bush, they're welcome to."

Hunt Smith, executive director of housing for the city, said: "I don't see a problem with people wanting to take their pets in.

"I will personally make sure that those people experience no problems."

Cape Argus

Comments:

I think that it is shocking that they are not allowed to take their animals with them. I too would shun going somewhere where my animals were not allowed. Where do these animals go to now? or are you, Hunt Smith, going to look after them. I think it is despicable that these poor animals, who in the first place did not ask to be there, now have to go to shelters and homes when there are thousands of stray animals out there looking for homes. This is just typical of the despicable humans that roam this earth!

Posted by Anonymous on June 30, 2010 at 12:21 PM SAST Report this Comment

Would they be allowed to keep the pets if they were sterilised? Perhaps people could sponsor sterilisation if it means that pets could then stay with their owners. I too would refuse to go somewhere if my dogs couldn't go with me. Just trying to see if there is a way to try and help here.

Posted by jean on June 30, 2010 at 09:08 PM SAST Report this Comment

It's a plain simple choice: house and no animals or animals and no house. While your pet is your treasure, it is almost always everyone else's nuisance.

Posted by Jon on July 01, 2010 at 07:29 AM SAST Report this Comment

Hunt Smith had said he would try and see what he could do so tenants could take their pets along! They have also been sterilised so won't be making a nuisance of themselves. I think if tenants could be restricted to 1 pet per household, the homeowners association / developers may have a change of heart. Unfortunately (or fortunately for some), many estates do not allow pets. Their argument is "if you don't like the rule", find somewhere else. Good luck!

Posted by Anon on July 01, 2010 at 10:48 AM SAST Report this Comment

The people making these pet-free rules seem both heartless and lacking in creativity. How on earth can one be so cruel as to offer better housing (and no doubt punt one's business as being involved in 'development') but, oh - sorry, you can't take your pet with you. This happens to people who are moving out of houses into other types of accommodation as well - pensioners selling up, downsizing. Just how meanspirited and narrow-minded do you have to be to separate someone from their pet and thus also make that pet homeless. I daresay the developers and their political contacts then hop into their big 4x4s and drive home to their steel&glass ocean view McMansions plus guard dogs for a nice square meal. We need to do better than this. It can't be that difficult. What price civilisation?

Posted by Carole on July 02, 2010 at 08:54 AM SAST Report this Comment

Are the beings that run the city people?

Posted by The Artist on July 02, 2010 at 09:26 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds