Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Thursday Sep 01, 2011

More time to comment on Cape cellphone masts

Cape Town residents have until the end of next month to comment on the city's new policy regulating cellphone masts.

The public comment period for the draft policy was to have ended tomorrow but has been extended.

Cellphone network providers argue there is no evidence the masts cause health problems. Vodacom has pointed to studies on the World Health Organisation (WHO) database that found there was no proof that masts were dangerous.

It also says cell masts emit a lower electromagnetic frequency than many hand-held devices. But residents' forums in the city disagree.

The Electromagnetic Radiation Research Foundation of SA said several international studies had found people living near masts had fallen ill.

Earlier this year, the city undertook to revise its 2002 telecommunications policy.

Ronelle Clarke, the senior environmental professional in environmental, heritage and resource management for the city, said the new policy would deal with all telecommunications infrastructure.

The new policy had a more "cautionary approach", emphasising that the infrastructure must be located away from "habitable structures". If within 50m of such a structure, the company must provide details of the radio frequency and electromagnetic fields.

George Sierah, the chairman of the Durbanville Community Forum, which is calling for amendments to the draft policy, said no "conclusive evidence" had been produced to prove the masts were safe.

The forum is calling for a clause preventing masts from being erected in residential areas, saying they should be at least 1km from "the closest human habitation", and that no masts should be erected on school or church grounds.

Sierah questioned the draft policy's precautionary approach: "If the city approached this issue with such precaution, why is it dotted with all types of emitting infrastructure? If precaution was used, these huge masts would be far from residential enclaves."

The Electromagnetic Radiation Research Foundation said international studies had found people had fallen ill because of exposure to the masts. Complaints had included heart palpitations, respiratory problems and headaches.

Foundation chairwoman Tracey-Lee Dorny said: "While Vodacom is saying it cannot be proved unsafe, there are thousands of studies showing effects. They cannot prove it is safe and will not sign any guarantees."

Vodacom's Richard Boorman said the highest exposure was from handheld devices, and base stations emitted far lower levels.

MTN said it followed guidelines from the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection.

Robert Madzonga, chief corporate services officer, said exposure to electromagnetic frequency from base stations was hundreds to thousands of times lower than the guidelines.

Cape Argus

Comments:

There's far too much rubbish spoken about cell phone radiation, whether from base stations or the handsets themselves. The wowsers want the telecoms companies to "prove it's safe." This is simply not possible, and in any case the burden of proof is not on them. There have been numerous studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals that have consistently failed to demonstrate any adverse effects from such radiation. It is not impossible that the radiation may be harmful in some way, but no has evidence has yet been found. In one study, self-diagnosed people who claimed to suffer from radio frequency hypersensitivity were placed in an environment where RF could be precisely controlled, and none of them could tell whether or not a base station IN THE SAME ROOM was turned on or off!

Posted by st0nes on September 01, 2011 at 03:14 PM SAST Report this Comment

I live near a mast and have 2 children under the age of 7. I am worried about it. They have done so much research in the UK and in France, whereby masts have been renoved. Doctors have admitted that they should not be put on school ground near children, not even to give your child a cell phone under the age of 12 for underdeveloped neuro reasons. So if they can't be on school grounds where kids are for about 7 hours a day, why do they erect them in rersidential areas where kids are for longer periods. Yes, we can't prove that they are a health risk or even cause leukemia, but nobody wants them close to their homes and there might be a chance thay do cause cancer...the fact that nobody knows is all reason to have them removed from rersidential areas.

Posted by celeste rawson on September 05, 2011 at 02:29 PM SAST Report this Comment

Any extra radiation has to be bad. The dependency on cell phones in South Africa - & amongst the youth in particular - is very worrying, as it will be years before the cumulative effect can be quantified. And I DO know that if my car's remote locking device doesn't work, chances are that if I look around, I will find a cell phone mast in the vicinity! I certainly would not purchase a property near to one.

Posted by Penny Gurney on September 05, 2011 at 10:54 PM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds