Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Monday Nov 01, 2010

How big should your property be?

"Unless they focus on what they need rather than on what they might want, homebuyers are quite likely to end up with too much house."

So says Harcourts Africa CEO Richard Gray, who notes: "In many countries, there has already been a significant move away from suburban 'palaces' to more compact homes that are more affordable, use less energy and are easier to maintain.

"And now we are beginning to see that trend gain momentum in SA, thanks largely to the strict application of the National Credit Act and the limits placed on initial affordability by the lenders' almost universal insistence that homebuyers put down hefty deposits."

"But there are several more good reasons for prospective buyers to be very practical when choosing a new home."

The three main things to think about, he says, are the size of the stand, the size of the home itself and the need, if any for "extras" such as a pool, a second garage or even a garden shed.

"If you want to move from a flat or a townhouse to a place with a garden, for example, you may well be attracted to houses on very big stands. But apart from having a higher cost of acquisition that will boost your bond repayments, a large stand will also mean higher upkeep and security costs and higher municipal rate payments for as long as you own the property.

"So unless you are actually going to use the land for a home-based business or have a plan to subdivide and develop it fairly soon, a smaller stand is generally a better bet."

When it comes to the home itself, says Gray, buyers often don't stop to think of their actual space needs, and what unused rooms could cost them in the long run. "But it is not rocket science to work out that it is going to be cheaper to clean, maintain and care for a 200sqm home than a 400sqm home. Your water and lights bills will also be smaller, and those savings will come on top of a smaller bond repayment every month."

And finally, he says, it is also important to consider what real use you will get out of those "nice to have" extras and whether it is worth paying for them. "For example, a swimming pool near your entertainment area may look good, but if you are not actually going to use it regularly, it would be a waste to pay a higher house purchase price just to have it, and an ongoing waste to pay for the chemicals and equipment required to keep it clean.

Harcourts Press Release

Comments:

This is such good information for new homeowners and I hope people will take it seriously. Eventually, the costs of space catch up with home owners and it is much easier to maintain a smaller home than a large property. Besides, there are benefits to the environment as smaller propoerties save much needed land for conservation purposes. Thank you so much.

Posted by Mina on November 01, 2010 at 05:08 PM SAST Report this Comment

I totally agree. Being a prospective 1st time home owner, this kind of information is very helpful and I surely home the Author will keep the articles comming. People need to stop impressing the general public vs practicality of a home for their families. Thank you again.

Posted by Nelda on November 01, 2010 at 06:02 PM SAST Report this Comment

This article does not correctly reflect reality. What is not mentioned here is the capital appreciation of the property which happens almost exclusively on the land. The value of the actual building decreases in time as it will require updating, yet the land ALWAY increases for as long as there is population growth. So rather than buying a nice modern townhouse on a 400sqm plot, you will be much better off to purchase a 1200sqm plot with an old house, the increase in value when wishing to re-sell in say 10years on will be2-3 times that of the townhouse. This is how people have always increased they wealth and it certainly will not change.

Posted by Marcel Fuchs on November 01, 2010 at 07:50 PM SAST Report this Comment

I agree with Marcel. One must also consider that perhaps at the time of buying, a two or three bedroom property may seem adequate but your circumstances are bound to change. What if you want to increase the size of your family or perhaps you may need to take in parents in their older years. With a larger stand at least you have to option of extending or even building a cottage or perhaps even two. Perhaps the thought of going through the selling and buying process again does not appeal to you at all. Besides, there are still areas, especially on the East Rand where rates and taxes and even electricity is much cheaper and we have the Gautrain now.

Posted by M on November 02, 2010 at 08:26 AM SAST Report this Comment

Actually, covering land in wall-to-wall buildings and leaving no space for large trees is not at all environmentally friendly! Also, buying an older house that we could slowly renovate and add on to at need has paid us hands down. The highest our bond has ever gone is R250 000 and we have a home that suits us very well, and a property on which it was easy to add a granny flat when that became necessary. Of course, the estate agents don't like this model. There has only been one commission paid on this property in more than 20 years, and that was on a much smaller amount than its current value.

Posted by L on November 02, 2010 at 09:47 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds