Contact Us
  
Thursday Dec 19, 2013

Family wins fight against bank for house

A Soweto family are set to have a joyous Christmas after their home - which had been auctioned by FNB - was saved by a court order.

At the time of the sale, which was set aside, the Thwala family did not owe the bank a cent.

Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) attorney Tashwill Esterhuizen welcomed the judgment as it addressed the reality of many South Africans who had lost their homes 'simply because financial institutions can play the game better'.

Delphin and Godfrey Thwala and their five children faced a bleak festive season as FNB went ahead and sold their home on public auction, despite the couple having paid the entire amount owed to the bank.

They had a bond with FNB for R54 000, this being 90 percent of the purchase price of their home, but they then lost their jobs 10 years ago.

The couple at first managed to repay the bank at monthly instalments of R720, but fell in arrears when they lost their jobs.

In November 2002, FNB claimed payment of R54 000, plus interest at 18.15 percent, and obtained an order declaring the property to be executable.

The couple were in Mpumalanga when the summons was served, and they failed to file a notice of intention to defend.

In July 2003, default judgment was granted by the court in favour of FNB. A sale in execution was set for September 2003 but was cancelled. Another date was set but was also cancelled, subject to the couple paying half the amount for which they were in arrears.

During 2003 the couple made three further payments. By mid2004 they had reduced the arrears on their account, but the outstanding balance had increased to R60 778 (with interest and legal costs incurred).

Between July 2005 and April 2010, FNB proceeded with a sale of execution, only to cancel it after receipt of payments from the couple to reduce the arrears on the account.

The property was eventually sold by the bank in 2010. By then the Thwalas had effectively repaid the entire amount due in terms of the judgment debt.

Setting aside the sale in execution, Pretoria High Court Acting Judge Andre van Niekerk said that throughout the seven years, FNB continued to operate the bond account as if judgment had not been taken.

This meant that although the amounts reflected as overdue comprised only the value of instalments that were not up to date, FNB continued to debit and credit the bond account as if no judgment had been taken.

'It continued to charge compound interest and add legal and other expenses to the account which were not provided for in the default judgment.

'In particular, legal costs in regard to the collection of arrears payments and the (numerous) sales of execution cancelled were debited to the applicant's account,' the judge said.

Last year, the new owner of the house launched an eviction order against the family, but they approached Seri.

Seri's lawyers established that by the time the house was sold, the Thwalas had in fact paid R500 more to the bank than what they owed, which they said rendered the sale void.

Judge Van Niekerk agreed and said there was no lawful basis for FNB to have proceeded with the sale in execution.

The Star

    
 

Previous Articles *

Search News

Property Searches:

Browse Property For Sale

© 2020 Independent Online Property Joint Venture (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reliance on any information this site contains is at your own risk. Please read our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.