Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Thursday Nov 12, 2009

Entilini fights Cape Argus bid to publish Chapman's Peak findings

Chapman's Peak Drive toll road operator Entilini wants to keep details of its concession agreement with the Western Cape government confidential and has asked the province not to release to the Cape Argus the report of the task team that investigated the issue.

The Cape Argus has applied for a copy in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA). The province has currently agreed to release just part of the report.

The task team was appointed by then premier Lynne Brown following growing outrage at the lengthy delay in re-opening the drive and at continuous payments to the concessionaire in terms of the the 30-year "build, operate, transfer" toll road contract.

Its report was handed to Brown just before the April elections but she refused to release its findings, citing commercial confidentiality.

New transport MEC Robin Carlisle said he would release the report but wanted to wait until negotiations with Entilini about a possible amended contract had progressed.

Acting in terms of the PAIA, Helen Zille's office informed Entilini about the application and invited it to make written representations as to why the request should be refused, or to its give written consent for the report's disclosure.

Last month, the company told the province the request should be refused.

This information is contained in a letter to the Cape Argus by the acting director-general of the provincial administration, advocate Brent Gerber, the designated PAIA information officer in the premier's office.

Gerber said he was refusing to grant the newspaper access to parts of the report containing financial and commercial information, "the disclosure of which would likely cause harm to Entilini's commercial and financial interests".

And, information supplied by the company in confidence, "the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to put them at a disadvantage in contractual or other negotiations or to prejudice them in commercial competition", he said.

Gerber also noted that in terms of the agreement between the province and Entilini, the parties had agreed to keep confidential all information, data or other records.

"I have accordingly refused access to that part of the report that contains information and data of Entilini that the province agreed to keep confidential, as contemplated by section 49(4) of the Act (PAIA)."

The Cape Argus is entitled to appeal against this decision, and is taking legal advice.

http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fArticleId=5241085

Comments:

Chappies is a public Road and to charge tolls on it is a crime. But to then refuse to disclose how much gravy is being raked in by the toll operator is really a disgrace. We, the public, are being fleeced at every opportunity by the ANC appointed and owned companies.

Posted by Richard on November 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM SAST Report this Comment

Could the residents of Noordhoek and Hout Bay lodge a claim in a civil court, arguing that Entilini has been obstructive, and is not operating in the spirit of the contract. If they were, they'd have tried to open the road! Last thought, is an African name all that is needed to be BEE these days?

Posted by Frustrated on November 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM SAST Report this Comment

They are the biggest thieves around with so much to hide - the work they did in the last 14 months while it was closed is purely cosmetic - a total cover up to get paid at the forecast traffic rate which is 40% higher than the actual - i.e. they make more money being closed. Not to worry about the closure of at least 15 tourist related businesses in Hout Bay because of the closure. They are a total disgrace - and are only interested in fleecing us. Plus the toll also silently went up just for good measure.

Posted by Hout Bay and mad on November 12, 2009 at 06:20 PM SAST Report this Comment

Everyone in the deep south - not just Noordhoek and Hout Bay - have been severly impacted by this debacle. I am in favour of a civil action against Entileni and an approach to the courts to get them to honour the pledge that locals would have reduced rates. They are disgusting. Entileni sucks.

Posted by Impie on November 12, 2009 at 07:08 PM SAST Report this Comment

Entilini must be being protected by someone in Govt, probably someone with financial strings linked to it... How else could such a patently one-sided contract have been agreed to (the alternative view is that the govt of the time were just plain stupid and lacked any vision whatsoever). Well Done Argus for pushing for complete transparency - we also need to know who the fat cats of Entilini are, and what their other business interests are. Somewhere there is corruption - of that we can be sure...

Posted by pro competition on November 13, 2009 at 07:31 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds