Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Monday Jan 11, 2010

Cape Town wetland policy to affect property market

The City of Cape Town has introduced a new flood plain and river management policy, which is well intentioned but likely to give rise to several problems, says Paul Henry, the managing director of Rawson Developers.

"The long-term effect of the new rulings will be to reduce the value of any property that can be developed close to a wetland or river system, for the simple reason that the owner can't now be sure that the original zoning status of the land - such as for a high-density project - will be honoured. All property owners, but especially those who had hoped to capitalise on their site's proximity to a wetland, are bound to challenge the law if it results in their projects being reduced in bulk or held back.

"I get the impression that these new rulings have been pushed through without much consultation with the ratepayers and/or developers who have been, or might be, involved with developments close to water systems," says Henry.

The laudable aims of the new policy, says Henry, are:

  • To reduce the risk of buildings being exposed to flood areas;

  • To protect and enhance the watercourses and wetlands' ability to act as drainage systems;

  • To enhance the appeal and value of these areas;

  • To facilitate their integration in an aesthetically pleasing and socially uplifting way with the urban landscape; and

  • To introduce an element of standardisation in the approval and/or modification processes that are applied to development near ecologically sensitive areas.

    Henry says many of South Africa's river systems are choked by invader species such as water hyacinth and typha (the common bulrush) and the proliferation of these has been boosted by nutrient run-off from artificially fertilised agricultural holdings.

    Pollution is noticeable in most rivers - the Jukskei in Gauteng and Umsinduzi in KwaZulu-Natal being among the worst affected.

    "In the Cape, the Kuils River, draining into False Bay, the Disa River running into Hout Bay and the Diep River draining into Zeekoevlei, are... carriers of disease.

    "Often, raw effluent is found in rivers which, it was thought, were protected by supposedly sophisticated, but now overloaded, sewerage schemes nearby."

    Henry says that in one area he is especially familiar with, the Diep River estuary (of which the Milnerton Lagoon forms part), canoeists are wary of taking to the water in summer because faecal pollution is so prevalent.

    "This can cause a range of infections and is particularly dangerous if swallowed, as does happen with children playing in the beach area.

    "It is now accepted that the choking of Diep River has gone so far that the river would be totally stagnant in summer if it were not for the inflow of waste-water effluent."

    Henry says the City should introduce plans for appropriate wetland-associated developments and set about cleaning up the rivers at once.

    "This is a perfect opportunity to create useful employment for those out of work.

    "In many areas, such as the suburbs of D'urbanvale in Durbanville, volunteers do valuable work cleaning up wetlands under the guidance of a nature conservation office, but this type of work should be in the hands of full-time employees trained by the local authorities."

    Henry says an education programme should be put in place to teach people about the importance of rivers and wetlands and to ensure that pollutants are kept out of the rivers.

    Weekend Property supplement (Saturday Argus)

  • Comments:

    This is potentially the beginning of a long overdue responsible approach to the managemet of our very fragile enviorenment in which we live. Unfortunately, unless this intitiative is taken seriously by NATIONAL government, it will not have much positive impact at all. It is all well and good introducing new management policies, however we HAVE TO also tackle the chronic overloading of sewerage and storm water systems, and address the HUGE problem of littering that is a national mindset, espcialy in some ethnic groups of our nation. Simply rezoning will not cut it, as good a start as it is. Re-education regarding the natural resources we are destroying, and getting communities employed in a hands on sense in cleaning up and MAINTAINING the clean up are all quite achievable goals .. IF national government is able to understand the far reaching importance of supporting this initiative.

    Posted by windtramp on January 11, 2010 at 04:29 PM SAST Report this Comment

    This is long overdue. I recently spent a week in Noordhoek, close to the Sun Valley mall. The septic tank at the property I was occupying had to be pumped out twice a week by local authorities. The local shopping mall has a sign in the toilets apologising for the foul odours in spring and summer, caused by "poor planning by local authorities". What does that mean? Sun Valley and lower Noordhoek are built on (an illegally) back-filled wetland - the water table is so high that septic tanks don't drain. Raw sewage running down the driveway is no way to live...

    Posted by CTLocal on January 12, 2010 at 08:30 AM SAST Report this Comment

    I believe that the only reason why areas like D'Urbanvale is able to keep their wetland areas clean is because the residents of more affluent residential areas take more pride in the their surroundings.Folks, in the less affluent southern suburbs - dont give a toss - and thats my personal oppinion.

    Posted by Ess on January 12, 2010 at 03:13 PM SAST Report this Comment

    The Table Mountain Fund of WWF SA funds the project in D'urbanvale, which is run jointly by local residents (the Uitkamp Action Group) and the City of Cape Town Biodiversity Branch. We can never hope to manage properly all our irreplaceable natural areas within the CoCT Biodiversity Network (which has 6 unique vegetation types within it, found nowhere else on Mothership Earth), wetlands included, without the support and "hands on" action from surrounding communities. You can add people in Tafelsig, Kayelitsha, Noordhoek, Glencairn, Diep River/Rietvlei to the list of folks that are taking pride in their environment - we have projects in each of these areas. Join the rush to conserve, folks!

    Posted by Table Mountain Fund on January 13, 2010 at 03:37 PM SAST Report this Comment

    ps. And good for the City in adopting this wetlands setback policy. It makes no sense that landowners and insurers are left with the pain long-term when planning authorities make bad decisions. You only need to look at the Southern Cape to see what bad planning does for us: R1b worth of losses in the last 7 years alone from the Southern Cape (and R3b over the entire W Cape) from floods alone. Not pretty. And that's just private assets i.e. it excludes State assets like the annually replaced Riversdale Waste Water Treatment Works.

    Posted by Table Mountain Fund on January 13, 2010 at 03:37 PM SAST Report this Comment

    I don't have much sympathy for the landowners here - hoping to capitalise on the natural beauty of wetlands without any thought given to the impact of their high density developments on the ecosystem they're exploiting. You win some, you lose some - isn't that a tenet of the quick buck mentality? Congratulations to the City for pushing these rulings through without unnecessary delays.

    Posted by Michelle on January 14, 2010 at 09:15 AM SAST Report this Comment

    Post a Comment:
    Comments are closed for this entry.

    Calendar

    Search

    Top Property Searches:

    RSS Feeds