Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Monday May 17, 2010

Cape Town's IRT team rethinks plans to cut losses

The management team of Cape Town's integrated rapid transit system, MYCiTi, is drafting a revised business plan to ensure it does not run at a loss.

The business plan will go before the council next month. Project head Mike Marsden said the team had been "quite successful" in modelling different routes to ensure an "optimum service" was delivered at "the best price".

A recent due-diligence report by PriceWaterhouse-Coopers raised concern over MYCiTi's projected annual operating deficit of R118 million.

A city summary of the report, which contains its response to concerns raised, noted: "The business plan for the project will be reviewed taking into consideration whichever (of the report's) recommendations are relevant and possible to implement."

The due-diligence report came up with numerous recommendations:

  • The city's potential exposure to VAT.

  • The need for a dedicated management team.

  • Various business and financial model recommendations.

  • Issues for officials to consider when determining fare revenue and changes to tariffs.

    Marsden said that within the first phase of the project there were many permutations of routes and different ways of implementing sub-stages, all with cost implications.

    The report explained that, depending on how the fare system and control centre contracts were concluded, the annual deficit could be lowered, while larger vehicles for feeder routes could reduce trip frequency and therefore operating costs.

    "The order of the rollout is being reviewed to prioritise more lucrative routes," the city said in its response.

    It was, however, noted that if the operating deficit could not be sufficiently reduced while still maintaining an acceptable level of service, city subsidies could be needed.

    The PriceWaterhouseCoopers report also suggested other potential sources of revenue, including charging for parking at MYCiTi stations.

    "These matters are being pursued and political guidance from council, in the context of the revised business plan, regarding key issues will be requested," the city said in response.

    The city would also investigate the possibility of aligning its transport plans with those of the provincial education department, and the possibility of benefiting from pupil subsidies.

    Marsden said several avenues to ensure viability were being investigated, particularly the issue of transferring bus subsidies from existing operators to the IRT.

    As to whether the 43 buses ordered for the World Cup would be ready in time, he said he could answer "yes, with confidence, provided there are no unforeseen eventualities".

    Half the buses had already arrived, and production of the rest was ahead of schedule.

    Cape Argus

  • Comments:

    JUst another bill that the SA taxpayer will have to pay because of governments stupidity!!!

    Posted by Steven on May 17, 2010 at 03:15 PM SAST Report this Comment

    Thanks for your intelligent comment Steven.

    Posted by Nick on May 17, 2010 at 09:35 PM SAST Report this Comment

    I'm pretty stoked for the concept of the IRT. But I had surmised that at some point, rationalisations would start coming into play that would in some very obvious way, determine that the planned rollout just wasnt feasible, if only because the existing infrastructure (which is not exactly done given this late stage!), will not be financially viable in the long run without major 'restructuring'. Mass transit is for the masses. The obvious aim for the IRT at this stage, was moving the masses to the stadium. In Cape Town, the only really well developed IRT structures link the west coast up till Blaauwberg to the stadium and the trunk line running from the airport to the city center. Here's the problem: the west coast boys mostly watch rugby. The real heart of cape town soccer lies in the southern suburb and cape flats. Yet there is no IRT. What sort of logic is that?

    Posted by Capricorn on May 18, 2010 at 07:30 AM SAST Report this Comment

    I really thought and had hoped, that IRT's primary goal was to improve transport for all by providing efficient mass transit, whilst simultaneously lessening the traffic load in and around Cape Town. The world cup, as a passing fad, should be secondary. But the opposite is seemingly the truer version of things, hence the rationalisations to follow for slowing down of implementing the various phases of this project, and more than likely, a proper chop. Another bloody gold rush for some privileged minority at the expense of a benefit to all, especially those bereft of safe, affordable and rapid commutation between home and work.

    Posted by Capricorn on May 18, 2010 at 07:31 AM SAST Report this Comment

    IRT is a multi-phased multi-billion rand project. What you have seen is but a third of Phase 1A with three more phases still to come. Work on Phase 1 will continue up until 2013/2014.Work has NOT simply focussed on the stadium. It was just better to use IRT as a World Cup starter service so that instead of simply hiring lots of buses, the infrastructure and bus fleet would be in place post 2010.IRT is NOT here to replace rail as the backbone but to complement it and support it. The Metro South East is not priority as the rail service offers reasonable penetration into these areas, and simply requires improved service levels and new trains.

    Posted by ctguy on May 27, 2010 at 09:27 PM SAST Report this Comment

    The IRT project already has billions more allocated in future years from treasury so that the project keeps going. Many fail to understand the scope of the project and many do not see the works stretching all the way through culemborg including a partially elevated roadway.Why add IRT to the Southern Suburbs when there is suitable rail services, reasonably safe and frequent, even used by tourists to reach Simon's Town. IRT is not about repeating services, but connecting, integrating and allowing for more alternatives at transport nodes.Its not a quick short term solution but a long term project that will require massive improvements on the part of Metrorail, PRASA and other transport services, as well as providing not simply buses, but cycle lanes, pedestrian routes etc. Its not whether we can afford IRT but whether we can afford not to implement it. Visit the website city's website. Click on IRT on the bottom left. Learn something. Stop thinking like 5 year olds.

    Posted by ctguy on May 27, 2010 at 09:28 PM SAST Report this Comment

    Post a Comment:
    Comments are closed for this entry.

    Calendar

    Search

    Top Property Searches:

    RSS Feeds