Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Thursday Jul 22, 2010

Cape Town property valuations found to be 'in line with best practice'

THE city's controversial property valuation process - which has come under fire for being inconsistent - is in line with international best practice, according to an independent audit.

However, the audit listed more than 50 shortcomings and recommended that they be addressed before the next valuation process.

It said the city should exercise better supervision and quality control; city staff should conduct or at least be involved in the modelling process and both valuation and value review must start earlier.

The audit recommended that all data collection activities should be done "in-house" and not be outsourced. Qualified valuers should regularly review commercial sales.

The International Property Tax Institute (IPTI) report is based on a sample of 30 000 of the 780 000 rateable properties in the city and is expected to clarify whether the last valuations process was adequate.

Fifteen officials were interviewed by IPTI during the audit.

The city received 34 800 objections from homeowners, who believed their properties had been overvalued, which meant they would have to pay exorbitant rates.

The valuations directorate contracted the services of IPTI to audit last year's general valuation process and benchmark it against a similar audit delivered in 2007.

IPTI is an international institution with extensive experience in conducting similar audits.

The final report found the city had completed the 2009 general valuations to acceptable standards "with substantial improvements and the achievement of good results".

The scope of the audit requires IPTI to conduct an audit and review of the methodology and procedures employed in 2009 to determine whether they:

  • Conform to best international practice in computer-assisted mass appraisal.

  • Represent progress from general valuations 2006.

  • Represent progress in terms of current industry trends.

    The IPTI commented that since beginning this process in 2002 the City of Cape Town valuation department had made great progress towards the integration and proficient use of computer modelling to value properties.

    The Cape Times previously reported that an independent but small analysis of the city's valuations had found an "unacceptably high" variation from actual sales prices, indicating poor results.

    This was according to property valuer Peter Meakin, who analysed a random selection of 420 sales, about half of those made in July, 2009, the city's chosen month for valuations.

    He found that on average property prices were overvalued or undervalued by more than 23 percent, double the internationally accepted margin, which states this should not be more than 10 to 15 percent - this measure is called the coefficient of dispersion (COD).

    IPTI reported a COD of 13 to 18 percent, much better than Meakin's analysis, but still outside international standards. IPTI noted this was an improvement on 2006.

    It said in previous years, contractors carried a majority of the valuation work.

    "Over time city staff have been gaining expertise and in 2009 performed many of the data collection, data qualification and valuation analysis functions. In the final analysis the city has completed the revaluation for 2009 to acceptable standards. The valuation department has instituted substantial improvements and for general valuation 2009 achieved good results," IPTI said.

    However, it said changes were noted in the commercial valuation methods and processes, and this area remained the one that needed "the most attention".

    "Significant improvements in organisation, staffing and technology have been instituted that bode well for future valuations," it said.

    The report also noted that in 2007 the lack of "fulsome validation" of sales was a serious shortcoming and should be addressed by regularly screening all sales and maintaining a valid sales database for future purposes.

    "A sales questionnaire could be developed to aid in the confirmation process," read the report.

    Mayoral committee member for finance Ian Nielson said the city's valuation system had improved substantially since 2006.

    "The key message is very simple. General valuations 2009 has been completed to exceptional standards and has achieved good results," he said.

    Mayor Dan Plato acknowledged there were problems with implementation.

    "I just hope everyone will study this. We were just trying to do good business and we meant good. We don't pick up anything negative in the report. It put all the negative sentiments aside," said Plato.
    "Data management continues to improve and be more efficient. The number of properties re-inspected annually increased from an average of 65 000 per year before 2006 to an average of 71 000 per year," says the report.

    Cape Times

  • Comments:

    What a joke! Instead of recognizing that there is a huge problem and that there is major shortcommings in the way the current valuations are done, the Council decides to rather waste money on a 'independent' audit! No Audit is independent if not auctioned and paid for by an independent party. No audit company is going to find fault at a Client if the Client is paying the audit fee!

    Posted by E on July 22, 2010 at 11:45 AM SAST Report this Comment

    First of all, what is "international best practice"? I have studied and recorded the sales of 51 properties in Kalk Bay and St James. Comparing the selling prices to GV2009 I have found the following:- 19 properties i.e. 37% sold at prices >20% of GV and five of these exceeded 100% 6 properties <20% of GV2009 In total, if 10% accuracy is selected, which is a 20% difference between high and low, 28 out of 51 exceeded this norm i.e. 55% of valuations are outside a 20% accuracy. Of the properties that were under valued, five exceeded 100% of market value, one by a massive 474%. I also found that numerous buildings have not been measured correctly, especially double storey houses where the only the footprint has been considered. Properties used comparative sales are also inconsistent and not good comparisons.

    Posted by David Price on July 26, 2010 at 08:38 PM SAST Report this Comment

    Post a Comment:
    Comments are closed for this entry.

    Calendar

    Search

    Top Property Searches:

    RSS Feeds