Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Friday Mar 04, 2011

Cape Town project 'poses threat to heritage'

A proposal for a modern development in one of the most significant heritage blocks that survive in Cape Town - and which includes the historic 18th-century Lutheran Church complex in Strand Street - has polarised Cape Town's urban conservation community.


The 18th-century Lutheran Church in Strand Street. Opponents of development plans for the block say they will severely affect this historical complex.

An urgent meeting was to be held today in a last-ditch attempt to stop the development, designed by restoration architect Gawie Fagan, one of South Africa's most decorated urban conservation experts.

The development has been approved by the province's statutory heritage authority, Heritage Western Cape (HWC), on the strength of a positive heritage impact assessment by Dr Steve Townsend, who is a former head of the city's urban conservation unit and a former chief executive of HWC and now an independent heritage consultant.

It has also been given the green light by the Cape Town Partnership and the Cape Institute for Architecture, and no neighbours have objected.


An architect's drawing of the proposed development as seen from Waterkant Street, looking south. The new four-storey office block, standing on 8 concrete columns, is on the left.

But the proposal has been described by acclaimed art, architecture and heritage consultant Dr Hans Fransen as "threatening to be the worst disaster to befall Cape Town's architectural heritage for many decades".

He has called an urgent public meeting at the equally historic Old Town House on Greenmarket Square today to discuss possible protest strategies, including an "across-theboard petition".

"This may be our last chance," Fransen said in his invitation.

The proposed development would involve renovating an 18th-century, two-storey historical warehouse; replacing its roof with a concrete slab that would become a parking deck; and constructing a four-storey, glass-and-aluminium office block above the north-east portion of the building, at the corner of Bree and Waterkant streets.

The office block would sit atop eight huge concrete columns - in effect making it a seven-storey development - with three of these columns penetrating the structure of the historical warehouse.

Because the complete block - bounded by Bree Street, Strand Street, Waterkant Street and Buitengragt - is a proclaimed urban conservation area in terms of the city's zoning scheme, the application must still be approved by the city's spatial planning, environment and land use management committee.

However, the city's report to this committee ticks "no" in the box for the question under the heading "Environmental implications - loss of or negative impact on the city's heritage, cultural and scenic resources".

The immediately adjoining properties are described as "unique" in the city: the Lutheran Church, the Parsonage (Martin Melck House, now the Gold Museum), and the Sexton's House.

All are provincial heritage sites. The city's report states: "These three buildings, together with the facade of the warehouse, form an unusually fine townscape (and) 'constitute one of the most important historical groups of monumental architecture in the city'.

"The new four-storey office block is carefully positioned to avoid it having an adverse visual impact on (these) most significant adjacent historical buildings."

Those opposed to the development are angry that a public meeting has not been held to discuss it. Nor was it advertised in the media or in the official gazettes as part of the public participation process, according to the city's report on the plan.

Also ignored were the "special interest" groups, the VOC Foundation and the Vernacular Architecture Society of South Africa, the report notes.

It records the heritage impact assessment as stating that the proposed development is "sensitive to its historical context", and has been designed to have "minimal impact" on the heritage resources in the block.

But Marie-Lou Roux, spokeswoman for non-government conservation groups the Cape Environmental Trust and the Habitat Council, said the development would "severely affect" the 18th-century Strand Street Lutheran Church complex.

The cultural significance of the proposed development site was "uncontestable", yet there had been no public consultation or opportunity for public participation.

"We urge the people of Cape Town to speak up for the responsible safeguarding of this gracious and highly significant remnant of our architectural heritage," she said.

"A very real concern is that if this high-rise development is given the go-ahead, it will be followed immediately with development plans for an eightstorey development on the remainder of the Waterkant Street erven of this block - applications which the city would then find impossible to turn down."

The city's report says the heritage resources branch supports the proposal, but that the urban design branch expressed concern about "the visual prominence of the shape of the new building".

Cape Argus

Comments:

This is unconscionable. I fail to see how Heritage Western Cape and the city's own heritage agency can agree with this. All strength to Hans Fransen. There are plenty of suitable sites elsewhere for large scale office blocks. It must not be done in this precinct.

Posted by Van der Stel on March 04, 2011 at 11:28 AM SAST Report this Comment

"the urban design branch expressed concern about the visual prominence of the shape of the new building". We rest our case. "We the people" the citizenry of Cape Town, need to stop this project. It is not in keeping with the scale nor the architecture of the rest of the historical block. Let us hope that conservation voices will be heard and not the clang of cash registers by the city fathers. Wiser heads should prevail. Thanks Hans Fransen.

Posted by David Bernhardi on March 04, 2011 at 05:16 PM SAST Report this Comment

What do you expect when Heritage Western Cape are nothing more than a bunch of cadre appointments, with an agenda to wipe out the early history of Cape Town, and advance schemes like this as part of their social engineering program?

Posted by Anonio on March 05, 2011 at 04:06 PM SAST Report this Comment

I just just read Heritage W/Cape's mission statement on their website. Seems they don't administer what they profess to do: ----- "Established in January 2003, this public entity seeks to identify, protect and conserve the rich and diverse heritage resources of the Western Cape. There are landscapes, sites, artefacts, buildings and structures that are of significance to the people of the Western Cape. Identifying, protecting and conserving these heritage resources will ensure that they are promoted and conserved for generations to come. These include: * Monuments, * Places of worship, * Historical sites, * Sacred sites, etc

Posted by Antonio on March 05, 2011 at 04:11 PM SAST Report this Comment

Pietermaritzburg is successfully destroying its architectural heritage through neglect. Cape Town has a different strategy. The result is the same : the heritage is lost for ever. I have found an old photograph of Cape Town (1903) in which the Lutheran Church in Strand Street dominates the inner city landscape.

Posted by Günther & Lynette von Fintel on March 18, 2011 at 09:48 PM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds