Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Monday Jan 04, 2010

Cape residents oppose nuclear power station

Residents opposed to the building of a nuclear power station at Bantamsklip on the southern Cape coast staged a protest march through Hermanus in December and handed a memorandum to the Overstrand municipality, saying the local authority had failed to represent their interests by supporting the proposed nuclear power plant.

John Williams, chairperson of the Save Bantamsklip Association, said on Sunday that about 300 people had marched through the town to protest against a proposal by Eskom to build nuclear reactors in "one of the hottest biodiversity hot spots in the world".

"Eskom says they want to build two 4 000MW nuclear power plants at this site which is a registered South African Natural Heritage Site and contains vegetation that occurs nowhere else in the world. It's a centre of endemism.

"Yet the mayor of Overstrand (Theo Beyleveld) has stated categorically that he regards the nuclear plant as a growth potential and said Eskom had hinted they would build schools and facilities as a spin-off," Williams said.

"We're saying that there is a big body of opinion that is dead against it. The municipality is utterly wrong," Williams said.

He said his organisation, which included ratepayers' associations, tourism associations, environmental groups and agricultural organisations, represented about 5 000 people.

The memorandum called on the municipality to formulate a "factually-based" Overstrand council position on the proposed Bantamsklip nuclear power station, on which the public could then comment.

It also called on the mayor to commission an independent study to determine the "true tourism and natural resource values" of the Bantamsklip site, and to determine the comparative merits of allowing a nuclear power plant to be built at the site.

The organisation criticised the municipality for failing to submit relevant information to the EIA consultants.

"The mayor been saying 'hey guys, this is a golden opportunity for us'. We're saying our environment is the very essence of our economy here. If we don't see the link between environment and economy, we are lost. We want to know if this (supporting the nuclear power plant) is DA policy or old Broederbond policy?" Williams said.

On Sunday, Beyleveld denied that he had said he supported the nuclear power station.

"I never said that. It's a lie. I said it's a growth potential but if it's going to harm the environment we must re-look it. My opinion is we need electricity but we must also conserve our natural beauty. We need to let the EIA process be completed," Beyleveld said.

He said three Overstrand councillors had made input into the EIA.

Beyleveld said "only 90 or 110 people" had been on the protest march.

"There are 38 000 voters. I can't become part of a pressure group," he said.

Cape Times

Comments:

At any time or place , if the EIA does not consider the outrite damage to the biodiversity or ecology of any area, questions should be asked as to why they have missed something, or did their back pocket swell? This type of "progress" should not be allowed in an area serving tourists or is an area of natural beauty. They should be looking at some place with the least value in all senses of the word "least" I would be inclined to join with those who wish to stop this madness. Schools? BRIBES !!!

Posted by Harold on January 04, 2010 at 11:45 AM SAST Report this Comment

The building of KOEBERG saved Melkbosstrand from the greedy property developers and was responsible for the civilised growth, within reason, of the town. Add to this the 3000 hectare nature reserve surrounding the station which is open to the public then I fail to see whats the problem. Oh! no it's the greedy property owners who live near the beach and are scared the values will drop. Wrong again.

Posted by Ian McInnes on January 04, 2010 at 12:28 PM SAST Report this Comment

I agree with Harold. Keoberg has added far more value to the area than any negatives and so don't see why the likes of John williams getting his feathers ruffled over. With all the regulation around the existance of Koeberg, its surrounding ecology is in far better condition than it ever would have been if Koeberg was never built. I say bring on the Nuclear Power Station - its the only way the ecology of Bantamsklip will be guarenteed to be preserved!!

Posted by UrBaN on January 04, 2010 at 02:09 PM SAST Report this Comment

Apologies I meant agree with Ian McInnes!

Posted by UrBaN on January 04, 2010 at 02:10 PM SAST Report this Comment

people are confused about the words nuclear....confused that somehow this thing being built will cause cancer for the next 17 generations born within a 300 mile radius as well as be responsible for the mutation of three new species of homo sapians- kill off all vegetation in the 50 mile radius as well as ruin half of south africas ecology. Eskom's other proposals centre around (re)deployment of coal fired stations where firstly we know that coal is a limited resource and will only get less available and more costly- plus the smoke and polution generated must surely factor into any environmental considerations. nuclear is cleaner and far cheaper. With modern control processes and systems this will also be extremely safe. This a no brainer and the right thing to do. as for the environment... now you'll get a corporate putting money into securing and looking after the environment- surely this is far better than depending on the municipality

Posted by Chris V on January 04, 2010 at 05:23 PM SAST Report this Comment

I have worked in coal mining and for the world's biggest uranium producer. The anti-nuke crowd fail to see the need for power in the cape - it is a long way to haul coal and coal fired power stations put out all sorts of nasty stuff in the fly ash. Using wind power is very nice but no use when there is no wind.

Posted by John Cairns on January 05, 2010 at 09:15 PM SAST Report this Comment

For wind power to work during no wind periods, you need a large battery or high placed water storage to regenerate hydro power.

Posted by Ewald van Huyssteen on January 06, 2010 at 04:17 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds