Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Wednesday Jan 27, 2010

Call to lower tax on property transfers in SA

Countries that place a high value on individual home ownership almost always ensure that their property transfer tax is low and if SA really wants to revive its housing market and get it back to "normality", it should be looking at reviewing the transfer duty scale.

This is according to Rawson Properties MD Tony Clarke, who says the time is ripe to get residential property moving and a reduction in transfer tax would be an excellent way to do it, especially as a further drop in interest rates is now generally considered as unnecessary.

Clarke says where the buyer is a naturalised South African, the South African Revenue Service charges no transfer duty on properties with a purchase price of R500 000 or less.

For properties valued between R500 000 and R1 million, the rate is 5 percent and for properties above R1 million the duty payable is R25 000 plus 8 percent of the value.

By contrast, says Clarke, the UK revenue service charges what is known as stamp duty land tax at a significantly lower rate.

On any property valued below £125 000 (about R1.5 million) British home buyers pay no tax at all.

On properties valued between £125 000 and £250 000 they pay only 1 percent tax. On properties valued £250 000 to £500 000 they pay 3 percent and on those above £500 000 4 percent.

Stressing how debilitating South African taxes can be, Clarke says on the equivalent of £125 000 where the British buyer would pay no duty the South African buyer would have to find about R65 000 in transfer duty.

On a home of £250 000 (R3.1 million) the British taxpayer would pay only £2 500 (R28 750) but the South African taxpayer must find R185 000.

The latest Absa figures, says Clarke, show that the average house price in SA today is priced from R850 000 to R950 000.

Buyers of such houses have to find about R22 000 in transfer duty, as well as rates and levy clearance fees, deeds office fees and VAT on these.

Bearing in mind that most buyers also have to have a 10 percent deposit as the banks are sticking to the National Credit Act criteria it is not at all surprising that buyers are still backing off, he says.

Clarke also feels SA should adopt the UK practice of taxing on the use to which the property is put and not on the holding entity through which it is being purchased.

If a review of taxes is undertaken, Clarke says, he will suggest that all homes up to a value of R1 million pay no transfer duty.

I-Net Bridge

Comments:

Well how about dropping the exorbitant commission that is charged in South Africa! The UK was used as an example, well their commission rates are about 20% of good old South Africa's estate agents boards, recommended, rate.

Posted by Emjay on January 27, 2010 at 10:05 AM SAST Report this Comment

A move by SARS to exempt all properties beneath the R1 million mark from transfer duty would not only kick start the property market but would also have a positive spin off on economic recovery. Most properties that would be regarded as suitable for an average family falls somewhere between R500 K R1 million generally speaking.

Posted by Craig Nelson on January 27, 2010 at 12:43 PM SAST Report this Comment

well, i for one didnt see this tony clarke mention a change in agents fees. they are as greedy as the banks. Imagine, a R1m house. you lose 75k when paying tranfer duties to the lawyers etc and then when you sell, if you go through an agent for the same value, you lose another 75k so actually the house stands you in at R1.150m . most people dont take into account these costs. if you buy the house it actually cost a million and 75 and thats the bottom line. Come on tony clarke, i know you are going to read this column, call for a drop in the agents fees

Posted by colinA on January 27, 2010 at 01:07 PM SAST Report this Comment

Those that think the bottom-feeding Estate Agents will lower their exorbitant commissions are living in a dream world! I have just put in an OTP to purchase a home for R1,75mil, and the agent has agreed to drop their comms to R100K ... that is still 5.7% of the purchase price. They are merely facilitators, who carry zero risk, so what justification can there be for their ridiculous commissions? Viva PrivateProperty-type websites, Viva ..

Posted by Crusher on January 28, 2010 at 07:33 AM SAST Report this Comment

Totally agree with comments above. I posted a similar comment to another article a few weeks back. Another point - The UK operate on a sliding scale - It doesn't take five times more work to sell a house for R5 mill than 1mill, so why isn't the commission percentage adjusted accordingly? More sellers AND BUYERS need to realise that sites such as private property are the way to go. For some reason there is still resistance to sell and purchase a home in this manner and many still prefer to go through an agent. I had two agents bring people through my house recently and they were absolutely useless. Neither had gathered sufficient info from me beforehand and as a result couldn't answer the questions posed by the potential purchaser.

Posted by Grant on January 28, 2010 at 09:46 AM SAST Report this Comment

i have to say, that this scenario does make me mad.My exwife studied law and wanted to go into conveyancing.and its the toughest of all the law fields to move into.the impact of so many laws are involved in property law.also there cannot be mistakes when selling land, and i understand their costs, which are still too high. and yes,the agents are useless most times. they havent got any feel for the buyers/sellers requirements. and we just sold a house last year, and one of the agents, still has photos of the house and furniture on their site. and this is 6 months after the sale. i am looking at purchasing a house for R1.75mil and i will negotiate with lawyers re the tranfer costs. i suggest that people negotiate with lawyers and agents re their fees.

Posted by colinA on January 28, 2010 at 10:38 AM SAST Report this Comment

i have to say, that this scenario does make me mad.My exwife studied law and wanted to go into conveyancing.and its the toughest of all the law fields to move into.the impact of so many laws are involved in property law.also there cannot be mistakes when selling land, and i understand their costs, which are still too high. and yes,the agents are useless most times. they havent got any feel for the buyers/sellers requirements. and we just sold a house last year, and one of the agents, still has photos of the house and furniture on their site. and this is 6 months after the sale. i am looking at purchasing a house for R1.75mil and i will negotiate with lawyers re the tranfer costs. i suggest that people negotiate with lawyers and agents re their fees.

Posted by colinA on January 28, 2010 at 03:32 PM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds