Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Monday Feb 15, 2010

ANC offended by Durban elephant sculptures

Officials are expected to present a report to municipal manager Michael Sutcliffe today on what procedures were followed in commissioning a R1.5 million elephant sculpture next to the freeway into Durban, which has offended some ANC members.

Work on the three elephants has been stopped, apparently after ANC politicians in the council objected that they were a symbol of the IFP.

The artist, internationally acclaimed Andries Botha, said yesterday that he had been invited to a meeting at the city hall in October last year by the head of international and government relations at the municipality, Eric Apelgren, who had seen elephant sculptures placed in other countries.

Botha said he had given a briefing on the Human Elephant Foundation, an organisation he founded, and city official Nick Combrink was given a mandate to draw up a contract with him for the three elephants to be positioned near the new Warwick Avenue interchange. His contract, presented to him by Combrink, was with the city sub-contractor Rumdel Construction, which was doing the upgrade in the area.

He said work on the sculptures began in November and was almost finished.

Last week, one of his apprentices was accosted by an unknown man driving a black SUV, who demanded that they stop work because the elephant was the symbol of the IFP.

The following day, said Botha, he received an e-mail from Rumdel, ordering that he stop work immediately, with no reason given.

The reason cited by Sutcliffe - and by the ANC chairman in eThekwini region, John Mchunu - was that the project had not been not discussed or approved by the council.

"I suspect that there would have been no problem if it was properly discussed," Mchunu said yesterday. "But the ANC is not in a position to comment on this issue until we receive an official report from the council. It is difficult to comment on this issue just on the basis of media reports."

However, Durban businessman John Charter tells a different story.

In a report in the Sunday Tribune, he says he met Sutcliffe at a cocktail party recently and, when the issue of the sculptures came up, Sutcliffe said they were being taken down immediately because "it's just not politically expedient".

Botha is adamant that the committee which gave him the thumbs-up was "duly constituted" and he had been given a mandate by the council to do the work.

"How else would I be able to work on an island in the middle of a freeway in the city? It's all a bit of a mystery. I believe that officials are going to be reporting back this morning. Until I get feedback, I don't really know where I stand," said Botha.

"I don't wish to malign anybody and I don't wish to be maligned. I was invited to put up an artwork. I just want the right thing done from now on and I want to save the integrity of the artwork."

He said he had already received half of the R1.5m due and had spoken to a lawyer.

"I did not break the contract and so I believe they will have to abide by it. I would not be at all happy if they tore them down, even if they paid me in full."

Botha said the elephant was a "symbol of Africa", and not just of one political party. Apelgren did not respond to messages left for him yesterday.

Cape Times

Comments:

so typical of the childish anc ethekweni council. maybe all elephants in SA should be culled so that the anc can feel better about their sorry selves. so if the elephants sculptures must go to settle the immature anc egos then maybe they should pay for the work done and reimburse the citizens who coughed up in the 1st place. by the way have you seen the incredible donation made by a philanthropic Durban citizen - a beautiful stuffed inyala positioned amongst the sterile planting and equally pathetic "lion" at the welcome to thekweni signage durban north M4. just goes to show there is still some class amongst the citizens even if sorely lacking amongst the ethekweni "officials".

Posted by irate payer on February 15, 2010 at 01:11 PM SAST Report this Comment

I could not believe that in this day there are people who think so lowly. Elephant does not represent any party. Elephants are revered in the Indian cultures, would therefor the Comrade not travel to India? Pietermaritzburg is led by the ANC yet its famous logo is an Elephant, why was he quite then. Does he burn all his R20 notes when they land on his pocket because they have an 'IFP' picture? Surely not. I am sure the IFP is happy with this publicity and this is not needed. Elephants are the last mammal beasts of dinosaur species. Comrade go back to school.

Posted by Nkabi Zondi on February 15, 2010 at 01:29 PM SAST Report this Comment

As usual Suthcliffe is inthe middle of controversy.He is ND `s worst enemy.

Posted by joseph on February 15, 2010 at 02:20 PM SAST Report this Comment

Should we now stop using the springbok, protea or other plant & animal unless it has something to do with the sport, political party, etc. Totally psthetic

Posted by Colleen on February 15, 2010 at 03:51 PM SAST Report this Comment

The issue here is that 3 elephant is what is represented by IFP in their flag. So having such means DURBAN is for IFP. if it was one elephant or two, or four etc it would not have sparked such issue...why three in the first place.

Posted by Lolification on February 15, 2010 at 04:08 PM SAST Report this Comment

If the ANC-run Durban City Council wanted an animal to represent its political ideals, it would have to be a skunk. On the other hand, as that council is so badly managed and corrupt - they've run a thriving city into the ground - maybe a statue of the world's great dictators; there's Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Duvalier & Idi Amin ... just to name a few.

Posted by Markiemoo on February 15, 2010 at 04:33 PM SAST Report this Comment

Why three ... look in any research paper on landscaping and decorative ideas, the useage of three items/ objects/trees/ sculptures for a unison ... mmm in plain english use three of the same kind and you bring over better picture... not just a tree or an object, but it looks better. Thats why parks and recreation plant trees in 3's have you noticed... its difficult to explain years of landscape studies in a few sentences... so try to make peace with the fact that that is the correct way to do it.... I love elephants because they represent who and where we are AFRICA...

Posted by Peter Pan on February 16, 2010 at 12:38 AM SAST Report this Comment

When does the leading party finally realize, that they don't own the country but are rather in charge to administer it. The mines don't belong to you, nor do the people. Remember who pays your salaries. Tax money does!

Posted by Anarch on February 16, 2010 at 07:20 AM SAST Report this Comment

I have less problems trying to raise my 2 children. They might fight a bit, but even they wouldn't be this ridiculous.

Posted by MarcE on February 16, 2010 at 07:50 AM SAST Report this Comment

Another example of what happens when you put selfish, power hungry ... no-body's ... in a position of authority. GET RID OF THE MORONS.. NOT THE ELEPHANTS !!

Posted by Bob on February 16, 2010 at 02:59 PM SAST Report this Comment

Mike Sutcliffe: Potholes, traffic lights that don't work, streetkids carrying babies everywhere, A1 which cost the council millions in lost rands, brown flag status on the beaches, closing off the beachfront over peak time - what about the restaurant owners?.... it's a joke. Most expensive municipal rates and taxes worst service delivery. Lucky you're in SA and not Japan eh? Andries was commissioned to do 3 elephants, if procedures weren't followed the municipality is to blame. Viva the elephants! As a taxpayer, who helped pay for them, I want them!!!

Posted by Metro Mike and the boys on February 18, 2010 at 09:28 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds