Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Thursday Sep 02, 2010

'1% drop in interest rate now essential'

The next Monetary Policy Committee meeting is likely to allow a 0,5% drop in the bank interest rate - but, says Bill Rawson, Chairman of Rawson Properties, the cut should be at least 1% if any significant change in the economy, the growth rate, job creation and in residential property sales is to be achieved.

Several interrelated factors, says Rawson, now point to the need for a cut of this size.

The first of these, he says, is the disappointing GDP growth rate which is far lower than most economists predicted. This lack of growth can, says Rawson, in large part be attributed to a serious lack of credit and funding, over regulation of industry and commerce and a dire shortage of technical and commercial skills in the vast majority of the population.

"It was expected," says Rawson, "that the growth rate would reflect the R93 billion spent on the provision of facilities and the running of the superb World Cup and on making the event the success it was. However, the current GDP growth rate is only 3,2% and, although Zuma and others appear to think that a 7% growth rate by the end of next year is possible, most economists would agree that without the stimulus of long-lasting, cheaper credit this is simply unrealistic. A 1% cut is now, therefore, a necessity."

The argument in favour of such a cut, says Rawson, is strengthened by the exceptionally latest price index rate, which, again, is far lower than most economists predicted. (The CPI has recently come in at 3,7%.)

"It has been said," says Rawson, "that the effect of excessive countrywide wage increases and the greatly increased electricity costs will raise the inflation figure - but at 3,7% we do have a considerable margin to play with and the risk of increased inflation will have to be lived with."

Looking at the credit supply situation, Rawson says that the banks, with their hands now tied by the National Credit Act, are still unwilling or unable to lend money at anything like the required rate. What is more, if they do come up with a loan, he says, the conditions attached to it are often on such difficult terms that it cannot be accepted.

In the housing sector, he says, the number of bonds issued has dropped by almost 50% and in his view it is time that the criteria of the National Credit Act were reviewed.

On the regulation issue, says Rawson, over regulation is now evident in many industries and the pendulum has swung too far in favour of labour. What is more, he says, the labour forces of South Africa are by and large insufficiently skilled and therefore unproductive.

"Despite this they are able to ruin the investor confidence locally and internationally and challenge the government with ongoing countrywide strikes. All this poses a serious threat to the government which must be aware that it is heading for trouble. Let us be quite clear on this: the loss of orders in the motor industry as a result of strikes is just one of the inevitable results that will follow from labour being now too powerful. Every other industry will feel the effect and from my own overseas sources it is clear that there is already a serious lack of international confidence."

Discussing the skills issue, Rawson says that private enterprise must be given tax relief for ongoing training.

"Apprenticeships are no longer in fashion, but as the educational system in South Africa is on the whole inadequate many jobseekers will require one to five years of training if they are to become really useful. This was one of the objects of Services SETA, but so far they have not achieved great success."

In China, by contrast, says Rawson, 70% of school leavers in the free enterprise zones have been trained for a job by the time they are 18. Additional ongoing training with their employers and a total lack of strikes makes them very productive.

A 1% drop in the interest rates would, says Rawson, probably give a further 10% to 15% of middle class South Africans the ability to qualify for a bond and become homeowners. It would also facilitate a much needed revival of the home renovation and home improvement industry.

"Those of us in property sales know that the demand is still there, but what we are finding is that month after month many people lose heart and give up the ambition of becoming homeowners because they no longer believe they will qualify for a bond. This has to be changed."

Regular renovations and upgrading of properties, adds Rawson, have traditionally been part of the South African housing scene and are always a good investment provided that the homeowner does not overcapitalize - but the lack of funding has hit this market too.

South Africa, says Rawson, can probably look forward to far better growth than most of the First World countries which, in his view, will struggle for at least another five to ten years before they can really claim to have left the economic collapse right behind them.

In the Rawson Group, he says, sales are now back to 2007 levels, but his group is the exception rather than the rule.

"We are a young growing group diversifying into all sorts of new areas and territories. Others with mature, more staid businesses focusing on traditional established areas have sometimes had to accept a 40% to 50% drop in sales.

"Nevertheless, all of us now need, and in fact have to have, the big interest rate cut which, we are convinced, will give the economy and the housing sector the stimulus it needs."

Comments:

Rawson argues that houses are unaffordable because (a) rates are supposedly high and (b) lenders are over-regulated. The notion that property is simply too expensive is conspiciously absent from this article. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the root cause of the current global economic crisis is an over-abundance of cheap credit which has lead to unwarranted increases in the price of assets (such as property), but little actual economic growth. Yet Rawson argues for even cheaper credit and laxer lending regulations. His desire to protect the real estate industry is understandable, but it would be foolish for more people to take on riskier and more unsustainable debt just to support property inflation. One has only to look at the examples of the UK or the US where interest rates have been at 0.25% for a year, yet house price sales recently dropped 27%.

Posted by Sceptical on September 02, 2010 at 12:58 PM SAST Report this Comment

I concur with Sceptcal! What a shameless piece of self-serving twat. Does he not GET that a housing bubble - lots of people who could not afford the houses they pretended to own - is the cause of major economic headache today? The idea that house ownership is some kind of basic right should have been buried long ago, why try to resurrect it unless to line your pockets at society's expense?

Posted by Cynic on September 02, 2010 at 01:20 PM SAST Report this Comment

I agree with the Sceptic and the Cynic. Asking for easier credit terms (in other words, credit you're less likely to be able to afford) seems irresponsible. But then society often becomes fixated with pushing financial growth over responsibility.

Posted by Disbeliever on September 02, 2010 at 03:42 PM SAST Report this Comment

Glad to see sensible comments here. The reality is that SA had the biggest property bubble in the world, even bigger than the US and Spain; but where they have had massive drops, we've barely had a dip. SA property inflated by between 250% and 300% between 1999 and 2006. A huge number of financially illiterate people (the ones who told you "Get on the ladder before it's too late!") thinks that that growth was normal and that any deflation is a problem. The reverse is true. Until global property drops to historic averages, the world economy is in bad trouble. SA prices will still drop by 40 percent in the next few years, have no fear.

Posted by Bean Counter on September 02, 2010 at 11:39 PM SAST Report this Comment

I support the views expressed above. Why are high and rapidly property prices such a GOOD thing? Surely houses are for living in, not investing in. If you want to invest, try shares, fixed deposits. And by the way, if you want lower interest rates, make interest earned on savings accounts tax free. Then we can finance our own credit LOCALLY and not be indebted to China. Is making China rich also a good thing according to these pundits?

Posted by tellytubby on September 03, 2010 at 07:32 AM SAST Report this Comment

Awesome guys! Its so good to see all the posts here have been given considerable. All the above comments carry substantial weight but we should consider the upside of the article. Here Rawson is fighting for lower interest rates. The gain that he will make is well noted by all but just look at the gain the community will benefit from should there be a 1% rate decrease. Most important - more affordable food! Imagine those families that have more than 5 mouths to feed and earn a low basic income of max R50 per day or less.How do they survive? 2 loaves of bread already set you aside R20 or more...and what about milk and your main meal? And for those who can afford to buy houses and fill Rawsons pockets, think carefully. If you are certain that house prices will drop and adjust itself in a few years, then wait. We should not refuse the many gains that will come to the whole community and struggling industries just because we despise one mans pockets filling up.

Posted by Bond on September 05, 2010 at 01:42 PM SAST Report this Comment

Bond: Please explain to me how low interest rates will help the poor. Do you actually believe these people survive on credit? Let alone have access to credit? How does it affect them? If that's not what you meant, then please explain the link between interest rates and the price of bread.

Posted by Le Roux on September 06, 2010 at 12:48 PM SAST Report this Comment

Bond, my gripe isn't with lower interest rates per se, but in arguing that "we" need them based largely on the idea that the propery market must be supported. I don't think there is a public interest case to be made for (unaffordable) higher house prices, and it shouldn't feature as an argument in favour of the MPC's interest rate decisions.

Posted by Cynic on September 07, 2010 at 10:25 AM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds