Search

or

My ShortList
Advertise Property
Status:
Max Price:
At Least:
Listed:
Pictures:
[ Close ]
#
Thursday Sep 09, 2010

15.5% of Cape property sales due to financial pressure

The latest Cape Metro FNB Property Barometer reveals that just over 15% of home sellers in the second quarter of 2010 sold because they were forced to do so by financial pressure or as a result of having their homes repossessed by a bank.

The 15,5% was some 3% higher than the number selling to upgrade their homes in the same quarter - a complete reversal from the situation in 2006 - 2007.C

"While the 15,5% is a big improvement on the figures for all four quarters of 2009 (where financial pressure caused up to 33,5% of all sales) it is still a cause for serious concern," said Lanice Steward, Managing Director of the estate agency Anne Porter Knight Frank.

"This type of seller is often so desperate that they will take an unjustifiable drop in their price to get some cash in hand. This, of course, retards the growth in prices and the recovery of the housing sector generally."

The latest review, said Steward, also indicates that only 6% of sellers are doing so now due to a relocation within South Africa. This, she said, indicates that new jobs are few and far between at the moment, "which is exactly what we would expect in a post-recession period".

As many as 12% of sellers, however, she said, are moving to be closer to work or amenities, including schools.

"In the Greater Cape Town area," said Steward, "I would guess that up to 15% of those living in the Northern Suburbs and the popular fast growing areas of the West Coast are contemplating a move of this kind so as to be closer to the city. This is because the commuting times at peak hour traffic have become intolerable. However, the problem may be alleviated by the introduction of the Integrated Rapid Transit System in 2011."

Another interesting fact revealed by the FNB Property Barometer, said Steward, is that the Western Cape's level of debt in relation to disposal income is the highest in South Africa - and this, too, is undoubtedly holding back a big revival in the housing market.

"The good news," said Steward, "is that this has come about because the Western Cape's per capita income is the highest in the country. However, an average debt level of 101% in relation to income, i.e. a debt level of just on a total of an individual's annual earnings, will limit borrowers' ability to get loans from the banks - who, by and large, like to see their mortgages awarded to those with little or no debts elsewhere."

Many leaders in the property sector, said Steward, have been campaigning for an easing of the National Credit Act criteria. She, however, does not go along with them.

"If well applied, the Act does protect the purchaser in the long term. What really needs to be looked at are the onerous lending criteria applied to self-employed buyers. Although many have been forced into becoming self-employed they have become very successful – and are entrepreneurial – exactly the type that South Africa needs right now."

In most cases, added Steward, the FNB Property Barometer shows that the higher the earnings, the larger the debt incurred. People earning above R750,000 per annum, she said, have an average debt in relation to income of 156% - over 50% higher than the average for the Western Cape. Under the National Credit Act rules, this makes it very hard for them to qualify for a bond of the size they would probably feel necessary.

Comments:

cape town prices is a joke u pay between R1 -1.5m for a 50sqm 1 bed flat near the cbd

Posted by anel on September 09, 2010 at 10:59 AM SAST Report this Comment

Nothing "unjustifiable" about the low prices that desparate sellers will accept; that is siimply the market price. What is unjustifiable is the absurd property price inflation that occured before 2008 due to people borrowing beyond their means. They all fell for the "property prices always go up" lie.

Posted by Neilen on September 09, 2010 at 11:52 AM SAST Report this Comment

I think what many people invested in property and/or the real estate industry still refuses to believe is that in the coming decade or more, we are unlikely to see the sustained rapid price growth that we have seen in the past decade. It was by all reasonable assessments "abnormal" and "unsustainable", driven by its own momentum (one could even say "greed") and various other factors. On "unjustified" price drops due to financial distress, i think this is a careless word choice and betrays some bias. Prices are justified solely by the fact that there are people willing to pay a certain amount, if they aren't then the "locked up value" in the property is revealed as imaginary. One may expect higher prices to be justified based on assessments of future demand, but this is inherently speculative. If anything was "unjustified", it was the price increases originally caused by many people buying houses they couldn't afford based on precisely such speculative assessments.

Posted by Apostate on September 09, 2010 at 12:04 PM SAST Report this Comment

Many businesses are going under, is it true that Erik Reeder is one. He certainly is not paying his debts.

Posted by 92.15.36.124 on September 09, 2010 at 03:20 PM SAST Report this Comment

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Calendar

Search

Top Property Searches:

RSS Feeds